Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label debt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label debt. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Foreign Aid Bill

I have posted quite a bit, and will continue to post, about the national budget. Of particular interest to us is where in the world our tax dollars go and how do the recipient countries treat America on the global and personal levels.

It would be in all of our interests to let these members know that we are watching closely how they intend to spend our money. The 2012 bill has less funds going to foreign interests than Obama wanted, but it amy be more than We, The People, should like.

Middle East: Rep. Kay Granger Steps Up
From the JPost:

Washington’s $2 billion in annual aid to Egypt will be cut off if Cairo backs out of the peace treaty with Israel, Congresswoman Kay Granger – whose job as chairwoman of the US House appropriations foreign operations subcommittee means she literally writes America’s annual foreign aid bill – told The Jerusalem Post on Monday.

“The United States aid to Egypt is predicated on the peace treaty between Egypt and Israel, and so the relationship between Egypt and Israel is extremely important,” the eight-term Republican from Texas said in an interview.

“As an appropriator I have two concerns: One thing is the continuing relationship between Egypt and Israel, and the other thing of course is what government we will be dealing with in Egypt, and what position the Muslim Brotherhood will play in this government.”

Granger, who is visiting Israel with a group of House Republicans, will also inform Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas that if the PA goes through with their unilateral statehood plans at the UN, $500M in US aid will be cut, including aid to the Palestinian security forces.
(Dare we say, “You go, girl!”?)



According to the information found at the link below, the members of the US House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations are
Republicans
Harold Rogers, Kentucky, Chairman
C.W. Bill Young, Florida
Jerry Lewis, California
Frank R. Wolf, Virginia
Jack Kingston, Georgia
Rodney P. Frelinghuysen, New Jersey
Tom Latham, Iowa
Robert B. Aderholt, Alabama
Jo Ann Emerson, Missouri
Kay Granger, Texas
Michael K. Simpson, Idaho
John Abney Culberson, Texas
Ander Crenshaw, Florida
Denny Rehberg, Montana
John R. Carter, Texas
Rodney Alexander, Louisiana
Ken Calvert, California
Jo Bonner, Alabama
Steven C. LaTourette, Ohio
Tom Cole, Oklahoma
Jeff Flake, Arizona
Mario Diaz-Balart, Florida
Charles W. Dent, Pennsylvania
Steve Austria, Ohio
Cynthia M. Lummis, Wyoming
Tom Graves, Georgia
Kevin Yoder, Kansas
Steve Womack, Arkansas
Alan Nunnelee, Mississippi

Democrats
Norman D. Dicks, Washington
Marcy Kaptur, Ohio
Peter J. Visclosky, Indiana
Nita M. Lowey, New York
José E. Serrano, New York
Rosa L. DeLauro, Connecticut
James P. Moran, Virginia
John W. Olver, Massachusetts
Ed Pastor, Arizona
David E. Price, North Carolina
Maurice D. Hinchey, New York
Lucille Roybal-Allard, California
Sam Farr, California
Jesse L. Jackson, Jr., Illinois
Chaka Fattah, Pennsylvania
Steven R. Rothman, New Jersey
Sanford D. Bishop, Jr., Georgia
Barbara Lee, California
Adam B. Schiff, California
Michael M. Honda, California
            Betty McCollum, Minnesota




Monday, August 15, 2011

Critics Question U.S.Aid to China Amid Debt Woes

Critics Question U.S. Aid to China Amid Debt Woes

Sounds almost like they read my post

With America still drowning in debt, critics in and outside of Congress say it’s time to reassess U.S. foreign aid -- especially to China.
"We started looking at the contracts and it was rather amazing that the No. 1 recipient of these taxpayer dollars were Chinese-state owned corporations," said Sen. Jim Webb, D-Virginia, referring to $320 million dollars worth of U.S. government contracts let to China. "I think we can take a good hard look where we're giving foreign aid."
The U.S. provided $47 million in "development aid" to China in 2010, even though the nation is already a military and economic giant and the world's only other true superpower.
The aid helped rural Chinese get on the Internet and improve public infrastructure - including metro train service in Guangzhou. Much of the aid is also channeled through the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
"Here we are sending money to a nation that we are diametrically opposed to in a time when America is broke," said Andrea Lafferty, of the Traditional Values Coalition. "People are losing their homes and jobs, so why are we giving money to China?"
Continue article:


Friday, August 5, 2011

Week In Review

This week has been busy for a number of people in a number of countries. 108 terror related bombings, which include those that were hoaxes and those which were found prior to detonation. The targets of these attacks include police, students, medical facilities, transit centers, and the like. Some of the bombings were dual attacks; that is to say, there was a second bomb timed to go off during the first responders arrival. One large attack in Iraq this week was timed to blow up people who were simply cashing their checks.

Syrian bodies, I presume Syrians, were reportedly being dumped into the ocean for disposal. Isn’t this some sort of environmental issue?

All these years later and people are still getting mysterious powders mailed in envelopes, why? Because fear works; that is the point of terrorism, to cause fear for a political gain.

Of course the United Nations is going to say nothing and do less in the wake of the attacks this week. The largest voting bloc in the UN is the OIC, the Organization of Islamic Countries; a group that has infiltrated and adopted its own policies which are contrary to all the principles of America. Yet, America still pays more than 25% of the UN operating budget and has paid to Middle Eastern states (which comprise the OIC) $33,486,000,000. That is nearly thirty three and a half BILLION dollars paid into the coffers of our enemies. That number, as shocking and sickening as it is, is only the tip of the iceberg.

The member states of the OIC are also U.N. members. Doesn’t this create a situation in which some states are represented twice while other member states are represented by one person?

The OIC has stood in the way of the US led Global War on Terror in many ways. One is by maintaining ccontradictions between OIC's and other U.N. member’s legal definition of terrorism. This has stymied efforts at the U.N. to produce a comprehensive convention on international terrorism.

In 2008 OPEC/OIC states have received $11,734,000,000 US Tax Dollars. I don’t know about you, but I want to identify the elected representatives who insist on these monies being paid, and firing them. Those reps should not even be eligible for their ”pension” after doing this. That is just my opinion, for what it’s worth.

Korea is in charge of the U.N. Office of Disarmament and the head of the Iranian Guard Corps is now the president of OPEC. A gross and I do mean ‘gross’ violator of disarmament principles, human rights, and an armed psychopath who has threatened America with unprovoked nuclear attacks is now in charge of policing the world’s weapons.

The price of gas is only going to get worse. I really cannot summarize the threats illustrated by Wiki-Leaks which I posted earlier this week. I expect that Obama is going to kill the Keystone XL Pipeline project. All those jobs, union members and non-union alike, are going to not happen.

Meanwhile, Pakistan has been busy ethnically cleansing itself. Enjoy the return on the investment of $963,000,000 dollars in 2008 in Pakistan.

The question is what now? What do we do now? We stop the leaks. Those bills, laws, acts, all that leaad to sending our money to our enemies need to be repealed, and the wirters/supporters removed. If the people who are in leadership positions can not love, honor, and respect this country and her citizens then they have no right being in those leadership positions.

Thursday, August 4, 2011

We Pay Our Enemies

From 2000 to 2009 the US, in grants and credits, gave the Middle East $78,006,000
In 2008 the figure was $10,787,000,000

In 2008 the US gave $131,724,000,000 to the world, of that the Middle East (Census Bureau Chart was not more specific) got $33,486,000,000

We are a giving nation. These numbers do not reflect the private donations, UN monies, IMF funding, or income from other sources. Why are we giving so much aid to countries that already have national resources that are highly sought commodities? That is to say, oil is the highly sought commodity.

Let’s look at some of these numbers in closer detail. In 2008 based on Census Bureau data the amounts of military and foreign economic aid (Table 1298) (NOP-Non OPEC Oil Producer);
China               $103,000,000                              DAC     Not found
Algeria             $13,000,000        OIC      OPEC   DAC     60 billion dollars in 2008 oil revenues
Angola             $58,000,000                    OPEC   DAC     60.1 billion
Ecuador           $52,000,000                    OPEC   DAC     8.7 billion
Iran                  $7,000,000          OIC      OPEC   DAC     73 billion
Jordan             $833,000,000       OIC                  DAC    
Kazakhstan      $112,000,000      OIC                  DAC     140 billion
Kuwait             0                                     OPEC               70.3 billion
Libya                $10,000,000       OIC      OPEC   DAC     50.3 billion
Malaysia         $53,000,000        OIC      NOP     DAC     60.1 billion
Mali                 $140,000,000     OIC                  DAC    
Mauritania      $240,000,000     OIC                   DAC    
Morocco          $696,000,000     OIC      NOP     DAC
Mozambique   $799,000,000     OIC                  DAC    
Niger               $50,000,000       OIC                  DAC    
Nigeria            $485,000,000     OIC      OPEC   DAC     61.6 billion
Oman              $23,000,000       OIC                  DAC    
Pakistan          $963,000,000     OIC                  DAC    
Qatar               0                        OIC      OPEC               33.5 billion
Saudi Arabia    $1,000,000        OIC      OPEC               253.3 billion
Senegal           $78,000,000      OIC                  DAC
Sierra Leone    $12,000,000      OIC                  DAC
Somalia           $351,000,000    OIC                  DAC
Sudan              $1,196,000,000 OIC                  DAC
Surinam           $2,000,000        OIC                  DAC
Syria                $36,000,000      OIC                  DAC
Tajikistan         $70,000,000     OIC      NOP     DAC
Togo                $4,000,000       OIC                  DAC
Tonga              $2,000,000       OIC                  DAC
Tunisia             $11,000,000    OIC                  DAC
Turkey             $21,000,000     OIC                  DAC
Turkmenistan  $23,000,000     OIC                  DAC
Uganda           $456,000,000   OIC                  DAC
UAE                 $1,000,000       OIC      OPEC               80.9
Uzbekistan      $14,000,000    OIC     
Venezuela       $19,000,000                OPEC   DAC     53 billion dollars in 2008 oil revenues
Yemen             $37,000,000    OIC                  DAC

The OIC has a permanent delegation to the United Nations, and describes itself as the second largest international organization after the United Nations.

The member states of the OIC are also UN members. Doesn’t this create a situation in which some states are represented twice while other member states are represented only once?

Most OIC member countries are non-democratic. This translates to anti-US

On August 5, 1990, 45 foreign ministers of the OIC adopted the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam to serve as guidance for the member states in the matters of human rights in as much as they are compatible with the Sharia, or Quranic Law.

Article 24 states, "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shari'ah." and Article 25 follows that with "The Islamic Shari'ah is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration."

Contradictions between OIC's and other U.N. member’s understanding of terrorism has stymied efforts at the U.N. to produce a comprehensive convention on international terrorism.

In 2008 we, the United States, provided to OIC members $6,739,000,000.
OIC states that are also OPEC earned a total of $4,635,000,000 in oil revenue.

We are also providing assistance to these states to bring them into the global market, ostensibly so that all can benefit.

OPEC/OIC states have received $11,734,000,000 US Tax Dollars.

Some of the states listed above are located in West Africa. A region that is described by the Africa Center for Strategic Studies describes as a source of growing terrorism and related threats.

Worst of the Worst FPM cross referenced with Hillary’s State Department Reports
Sudan torture, rape, child sexual abuse, restrictions on speech, extrajudicial killings, obstruction of humanitarian aid, restrictions on movement, religion and gatherings, the government bombs and burns civilian areas, trafficking in persons, and the list goes on. Now, if a US contractor or military member is found to be paying for the trafficking of persons they will be brought up on charges and jailed. Why is it alright for the State Department to pay any country that continues this?

Turkmenistan inability to change their government; reports of torture and mistreatment of detainees; incommunicado and prolonged detention; arbitrary arrest and detention; denial of due process and fair trial; arbitrary interference with privacy, home, and correspondence; restrictions on freedom of speech, press, assembly, and association; restrictions on religious freedom, including continued harassment of religious minority group members; restrictions on freedom of movement for some citizens; violence against women; and restrictions on free association of workers.

Uzbekistan The United States is concerned by the Uzbek Supreme Court’s decision to close the Human Rights Watch Office in Tashkent. International NGOs such as Human Rights Watch have an important function to play around the world, and we regret that Human Rights Watch will not be able to do so in Uzbekistan. … The government tightly controlled the mass media and treated criticism of the regime as a crime.

Iran Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life, Disappearance, rape, murder, torture, arbitrary arrests, enforced disappearances, denial of fair trial, no due process, confiscation of property (sounds like eminent domain),

China Look into the archive list to the side as I have already begun their profile due to being part of the UNSC.

Libya They were bad enough and weak enough for the UN to call military action against them a good thing.

Syria The security forces committed arbitrary or unlawful killings, caused politically motivated disappearances, and tortured and physically abused prisoners and detainees with impunity …The government violated citizens' privacy rights. The government imposed severe restrictions on civil liberties: freedoms of speech and press, including Internet and academic freedom; freedoms of assembly and of association, including severe restrictions on nongovernmental organizations (NGOs); and freedoms of religion and movement. An atmosphere of corruption pervaded the government. Violence and societal discrimination against women continued, as did sexual exploitation, increasingly of Iraqi refugees, including minors. The government discriminated against minorities, particularly Kurds, and severely restricted workers' rights.

Egypt Well, now that they are under the control of the Muslim Brotherhood, I think things are going from bad to worse

Venezuela The following human rights problems were reported by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), the media, and in some cases the government itself: unlawful killings, including summary executions of criminal suspects; widespread criminal kidnappings for ransom; prison violence and harsh prison conditions; inadequate juvenile detention centers; arbitrary arrests and detentions; corruption and impunity in police forces; corruption, inefficiency, and politicization in a judicial system

UgandaAgain, I have already begun a profile on Uganda as part of the UNSC

Monday, July 25, 2011

Clinton, UN, et al Get Called With The BS Flag!!!

Alright, folks, I encourage all of you to throw the bright yellow BS Flag on me because I am going to throw it on everyone I can. Secretary of State Clinton has just promised $28 Million dollars of aid to Somalia. This is due to the drought and the starvation of this war-torn country.

Look at the guilt inducing line that France is using. The world has failed Somalia. Failed them? How? This is one of the many countries in which the people live and die by the proverb that starts with Me and My country against the world and boils down to Me. They start off with fighting the world, but when they starve it is our fault?

Also, the southern regions of Somalia where Clinton indicated that she wants to send the aid is held by al-Shabaab, a terrorist affiliate of al-Qaida. Any aid that goes in is going to go straight to Shabaab. They have killed aid convoy drivers and guards to get the food in better times. They certainly will now.

Shabaab has also BANNED, under threat of death that, if they EVER set foot near Somali soil, these organizations’ workers will be killed. Those aid organizations that are allowed there are operating in conjunction with Shabaab just to stay alive.

Somalia is now, and has forever (at least since Mohamad's  cousin, Somali, was there) a Money Making Scheme that DWARFS all pyramid mailbag schemes.

25 July 2011 Last updated at 07:22 ET
Horn of Africa famine: France warns of 'scandal'
The BBC's Andrew Harding says getting aid deeper into Somalia "is very slow, very complicated and... very dangerous""
The world has "failed to ensure food security", France's agriculture minister has said at the UN food agency crisis talks on East Africa's drought.
"If we don't take the necessary measures, famine will be the scandal of this century," AFP news agency quotes Bruno Le Maire as saying in Rome.
More than 10m people are thought to be at risk of starvation and famine has been declared in two areas of Somalia.
Ahead of the summit, the World Bank pledged $500m (£307m) to help.
Some $12m will be for immediate assistance to those worst hit by what the UN says is East Africa's worst drought in 60 years.
But the bulk of the money will go towards long-term projects to aid livestock farmers.
UN chief Ban Ki-moon has urged donor nations to supply an extra $1.6bn in aid.
Earlier the Red Cross said it had delivered food to one of Somalia's worst-hit areas, which is controlled by Islamists.
Working through a local committee, the Red Cross delivered food for 24,000 people by lorry.


'Question of life and death'
Analysis Andrew Harding Africa correspondent


There are dozens of experienced local aid organisations already working throughout Somalia - a fact that often gets lost in the furore over al-Shabab's hostile attitude towards some of the bigger international organisations, like WFP.
There's no doubt that the drought - and the Arab spring - have shaken up the security situation in Somalia.
Anecdotal evidence suggests al-Shabab is now seriously short of money, more divided than ever, and many of the foreign jihadist fighters who came to join it have left the country for other struggles.
Al-Shabab, an al-Qaeda-affiliated group which controls large swathes of south and central Somalia, had imposed a ban on foreign aid agencies in its territories in 2009, but has recently allowed limited access.
But the World Food Programme says it still cannot reach 2.2 million people inside Somalia as refugees continue to pour over the Kenyan and Ethiopian borders.
Somalia is thought to be worst-hit by the crisis, but Ethiopia and Kenya have also been affected.
Analysts say the drought has been caused by the lack of rains and the failure of governments to adequately finance agriculture and irrigation schemes.
The meeting of ministers from the G20 nations at the UN's Food and Agriculture Organisation headquarters in Rome was requested by France, the current chair of the G20 group of powerful economies.
"Our meeting is a question of life or death for tens of thousands of people," Mr Le Maire said at the start of the meeting, AFP reports.
Bob Geldof and other celebrity activists are urging the international community to come up with more cash.
They accuse some countries - Italy, France, the Arab states and Germany - of contributing too little in proportion to their national wealth.
Ethiopia safety-net
Mr Le Maire told the BBC said the first aim of the meeting was to co-ordinate the aid and response to the crisis.
"The second goal is also to think about the future and the long-term perspective because what we see here in Africa is that people need to have their own food and to have their own agriculture," he said.
BBC Africa analyst Martin Plaut says many people at the heart of the current disaster - in Ethiopia - have emerged relatively unscathed.
This is because the government in Addis Ababa has such an extensive safety net in place, he says.
Pre-positioned supplies mean the Ethiopian authorities could respond rapidly once the extent of the drought became clear.
The first food distributions began in February and have continued to the worst effected communities across a vast area.
Communities are suffering, but the famine that has hit neighbouring Somalia has so far been avoided in Ethiopia and overall the disaster management system, built up since the 1980s, has worked.



Al-Shabab bans 3 Aid Organizations from its territories
Allvoices – Mohammed Omar Hussein

Al-Shabab an armed adversary Islamist faction in Somalia has banned the operation of three humanitarian organizations within its territories mainly in southern and central Somalia.

They (Al-Shabab) said that these three humanitarian organizations are spreading Christianity within the Muslim communities in Somalia.

The names of these three humanitarian organizations which are stopped from operating in Al-Shabab controlled areas are; World Vision, ADRA AND DIAKONIA.

The banning of the three humanitarian organizations came after a decree has came out a branch of Al-Shabab called (OSAFA) which deals with the monitoring of the humanitarian organizations in the places where they control.

In the decree from Al-Shabab’s humanitarian monitoring office says that ADRA was the founder of a church called the Seventh - day Adventist church. And when it comes to DIAKONA it was said that it is behind the establishment of three big churches in Sweden whereby thousands of Christians gather for prayers.

And lastly but not the least the decree says that the WORLD VISION is spreading Christianity among the Somali people and by seeing its log one can automatically see that this is an organization which is disguising itself in the name of charity, but in the real sense spreading Christianity.

In the last paragraph of the decree from the Al-Shabab office has warned the other sub-contract organizations which are clandestinely affiliated with the banned organization to stop their activities immediately.

Al-Shabab has earlier uprooted several other humanitarian organizations from the areas under its authority such as World Programme and CARE International while thousands of Somalis are severely suffering of malnutrition and other related human problems.


Al Shabaab’s Real And Perceived Victims

Thursday, 11 February 2010 10:33 By Ogaden Online Staff

Militants of al Shabaab train with weapons on a street in the outskirts of Mogadishu,early November (Photo: Mowlid Abdi / Reuters)
Editors Note: This is the first part of a three part series examining the hreat, real or perceived, posed by Al Shabaab, its beneficiaries, and how est to talk this threat.

Lately, perusing the news events from many Western countries such as the United States of America (USA), Canada, Great Britain, and Australia, for example, one would be forgiven to assume that these countries are under an ‘imminent’ attack from a group known as Al Shabaab. Al Shabaab is an Arabic term referring to youth in general. It is also a group with a ragtag army consisting of ‘religious’ vagabonds from many parts of the globe and some confused local Somali youth.

Authorities in the USA have, and continue to have, investigated the sudden disappearance of some American and Somali American youth who were believed to have been ‘recruited’ by Al Shabaab. Al Shabaab, through what later turned out to be a Somali Canadian ‘inter-clan rivalry’, even succeeded in being investigated as being a potent threat to the historic swearing in ceremony of President Obama in January 2009.

The Canadians have, and continue to have, dealt with cases regarding the disappearance of some Somali Canadian youth. The way the head of the Canadian national police force known as the RCMP discussed publicly the threat posed by Al Shabaab to Canada recently, one would have thought that Al Shabaab fighters were now roaming the streets in many Canadian cities.

It is believed that the Australians have a task force dealing with the potential threat posed by Al Shabaab or what the Western intelligence community may term as local Al Shabaab sympathizers. There have even been arrests in Australia of armed individuals who were reported to have been planning to attack a major Australian military installation.

The way Al Shabaab had lately grabbed the attention of the Western intelligence community, politicians and policy analysts alike, one might think that this face-covering ‘religious’ zealots and confused local Somali youth from southern Somalia have the means to launch attacks with devastating effects against the West.

Yet, many political and military analysts in the Horn of Africa (HOA) believe that even though the group may boast with preposterous propaganda threatening future attacks in far-flung Western countries, in the near term, Al Shabaab has neither the military means nor the logistical capability to launch attacks beyond Southern Somalia.

Although the news from the West may sound as if the West is a victim of Al Shabaab, both military and political experts in the HOA interviewed by the Ogaden Online Staff (OOS) as part of the research for this writing agree that Al Shabaab’s REAL victims are the Somali Nation, Somalis in Somalia and those in the Western Diaspora, and the just cause of the Ethnic Somalis in Ogaden respectively.

The Somali Nation

There is no argument that Al Shabaab has victimized the Somali nation in general. It has destroyed many national monuments. It dug the graves of the long dead, both Somalis and foreigners. It has banned the use of the blue Somali national flag with the white star. In all throughout southern Somalia, it has mandated the use of its own black flag with an Arabic inscription.

In essence, what Al Shabaab has succeeded in doing in the short time it has been in control of Southern Somalia is to destroy anything of substance to the Somalis as a nation. An individual with immense knowledge of the Somali nation termed Al Shabaab’s victimization of the Somali
nation as nothing short of a national ‘calamity.’ The individual concluded that Al Shabaab’s sole objective appears to be the total eradication of any symbol that the Somali nation may have had in the past.

Al Shabaab appears determined to destroy, by any means, the only thing that has survived the twenty plus years Somali civil war: the sanctity of the Islamic religion. Although there has been a long history of Somali inter or intra-clan warfare, there has never been a Somali war, civil or otherwise, based on religion.

What Al Shabaab has done is to label any Somali national-the majority of the most prominent religious Islamic Somali scholars have rejected Al Shabaab’s ideology, who does not agree with its ideology and narrow-minded interpretation of the Islamic religion as a Takfir – an ‘apostasy in Islam.’ An HOA political analyst pointed out that “the intention is deliberate and is meant to remove any dissenting voices by using the Islamic religion as a cover and a basis for its ‘wicked’ actions against  the Somali nation.”

As one of the most vivid, yet, recent examples of the Takfirization of individuals or groups who oppose Al Shabaab’s agenda or its recent prominence in southern Somalia, a prominent HOA scholar pointed to the  root cause of the recent war between Al Shabaab and a group called Xisbul  Islam, Islamic Party.

The scholar rightly postulated as was also publicly acknowledged by Al Shabaab, that the Xisbul Islam group was simply demanding that Al Shabaab fulfill its part of the bargain to administer the Southern City of  Kismaayo as was agreed to when the groups took the city from a Somali warlord back in 2008. Instead, Al Shabaab labeled the leader of this group in Southern Somali as a Takfir and waged a brutal war which caused untold casualties within the two opposing groups and to the Somalis living in  southern Somalia as many had to flee their homes and seek refuge in Kenya.

Somalis in Somalia

The victims most impacted by Al Shabaab’s daily transgressions in the name of Islam are the Somalis who live in the areas where Al Shabaab now either fully controls, such as southern Somalia, or the places where it wages its war of attrition. These Somalis, through no fault of their own, now find themselves ruled by individuals some of whom may have less than three years of formal Islamic knowledge, let alone any idea of Islamic jurisprudence.

These individuals call themselves Emirs, Islamic leaders, although they may have little or no knowledge of the Islamic religion. These very same individuals may issue misguided ‘religious edicts’ ordering the loss of limps such as hands and or legs for individuals accused of theft without verifiable evidence as demanded by Islam or without them first providing the accused ‘thief or thieves’ sustenance which may have otherwise prevented them from stealing in the first place as is mandated by Islam.

They may order the stoning to death of accused ‘adulterers’ mainly women to date without providing witnesses who were present when and where the actual adultery may have taken place which is what is required under Islamic law. Worse, without any considerations to logic or logistics, these ‘Emirs’ may order, for example, the women in an entire city to cover  themselves from head to toe in a short amount of time, say in a day or two.

A knowledgeable source once articulated the absurdity and the logistical impossibility of the Somalis fulfilling such illogical ‘edicts’ as this: “Even if the city folks, as happened in Baidoba for example, were ready to fulfill the edict, one would neither find the clothing nor the tailors to make such clothing for an entire city in such a short turnaround.”

Somalis in the Diaspora

Given the twenty plus year old Somali civil strive and the former Somali military rule, many Somalis have found themselves resettling in many countries including those in the West in droves. Although it is not easy  to obtain an accurate count of the number of Somalis living in any one of these nations, however it is believed that the largest Somali Diaspora community in the West is found in Canada.

Most of these Somalis have now become citizens of their host countries. Many of these Somalis may also have had children who were born in the West or who may have spent most of their early childhood and now adolescence life in the West. Many of these youth may have yet to see their parents’ birth places in Somalia.

Since there are areas such as the North West and North East, for example, where people enjoy relative peace and have some sort of local governance compared to the South, it has become a tradition for some individuals from these areas to send their kids during the extended summer school breaks to these areas of Somalia. The adults may have also either gone back to start businesses or to visit their loved ones.

With the ascension and sudden prominence of Al Shabaab in Somalia, any one especially the Somali youth who travels to Somalia now is automatically labeled and investigated by the intelligence authorities in these countries. The suspicion is that these citizens of Somali origin may be going there for reasons other than visiting family members.

During the extensive research undertaken for this writing, one of the Ogaden Online Staff staff came across a case that highlights the enormity of the situation faced by the naturalized Somali citizens in the West as a result of Al Shabaab’s prominence. In one of the Western countries, parents of Somali origin are said to have sent back to Somalia one of their sons for what was said to be a family visit.

The son was reported to have died after being stabbed to death by a local Somali youth following an argument. When the parents reported their son’s death in Somalia to their adopted country, it is said that they were suspected of covering up for their son’s death following what the local authority termed as ‘fighting for Al Shabaab.’ It is said that the family had to stop the burial of their son in their home country in order to bring their son’s remains back to the West for an autopsy to prove the cause of his death.

The Ogaden Cause - Viewed as a Collateral Damage

Towards the end of the year 2008, many individuals may not recall that the regime of Meles Zenawi, the leader of the Woyane clique in Ethiopia, was in a very bad shape both militarily and politically following its failed  military excursion in Somalia. Zenawi’s regime failed to provide any tangible proof of the thousands of ‘foreign militants’ it claimed to have pursued inside Somalia. Despite having an army numbered in excess of 50,000, it had also failed militarily to help the Somali Transitional Federal Government (STFG) stand on its feet given the historical enmity between the two nations.

Instead of helping the STFG, It is believed that Meles Regime in Ethiopia worked tirelessly behind the scenes against the strengthening of the STFG by arming and coddling local warlords in its payroll. Worse, Zenawi’s regime was accused by reputable human rights organizations such as Amnesty International of indiscriminate shelling of civilians, extrajudicial killings, and many crimes against humanity committed by its poorly trained army deployed in Somalia.

At the same time, was finally facing an excessive pressure from the West brought on by the most extensive human rights research undertaken by a Western human rights organization concerning the genocide that was taking place in Ogaden. Human Rights Watch  (HRW) published its report of ‘crimes against humanity’ in Ogaden perpetrated by the same Zenawi led that at the time had large military presence in Somalia.

The European Union stopped its aid as a result of these reported and verified with the help of commercial satellite images of Woyane led  human rights transgressions. At the same time, the USA government was rethinking about its strategy in the horn. It was reported by highly placed sources that towards the end of 2008, the USA government was pressuring the Woyane-led regime in Ethiopian to pull out of Somalia altogether. The US was also said at the time to have been quietly demanding that Zenawi and his clique in Addis Ababa address the human rights situation in Ogaden.

When the Ogaden issue finally appeared to have gained traction in the West, all over sudden Al Shabaab gained military prominence in southern Somalia. Given that the West was wary of the threat, real or perceived, posed by Al Shabaab; given that not a single country in the West was willing to militarily deploy its troops in Somalia to nip in the bud the threat posed by Al Shabaab, the West started to ease the pressure on Zenawi’s regime in Ethiopia.

Instead of continuing the demands for Zenawi to open up access to Ogaden for the world to witness the genocide it perpetrated there, many Western countries with clout in the horn viewed Zenawi and his poorly trained militias masquerading as the Ethiopian army as what a HOA analyst termed as a ‘necessary evil.’ Zenawi’s regime all over sudden became an ‘evil’ that could one day deploy its troops back in Somalia should Shabaab militants attempt to extend its territorial gains. Thus, the Ogaden issue and the just cause of the Somalis in Ogaden became forgotten again given all the talk of ‘religious’ vagabonds who were claiming to be reading to cross in to Ogaden to pursue the ‘Ethiopians.’

To date, Zenawi’s dictatorial regime continues to overplay its newly found calling card called Al Shabaab. When there is talk of its human rights transgression in Ogaden, it always brings a quote from yet another ‘religious’ Al Shabaab illiterate who is claiming to be ready to wage Jihad, holy war, with the ‘Ethiopians’ in Ogaden. In essence, such talk appears to allow the West to look the other side when it comes to the  genocide in Ogaden in order to keep the Zenawi’s Woyane led militants onside just in case they are needed militarily in the near future.

Conclusion

It is undeniable that the West has awoken to the sudden military dominance of Al Shabaab in southern Somalia. It is also undeniable that the West is not in the near term a victim of Al Shebaab’s militancy shenanigans. However, today there are real victims of Al Shabaab. The once proud but now down trodden Somali nation is the first victim of Al Shabaab. The Somali people both inside Somalia and those in the West have suffered due to and as a result of Al Shabaab’s prominence.

Moreover, Zenawi’s dictatorial regime has taken advantage of the rise of Al Shabaab by changing the channels on the Ogaden genocide. It is in the West’s interest and in the interest of the people of the Horn of Africa that both the threat posed by Al Shabaab and the Zenawi led  regime be addressed properly.


---
By Ogaden Online Staff
Last Updated ( Thursday, 11 February 2010 11:23 )